|
Letter
to the Editor
July 1, 2009
Dear glassBYTEs.com/AGRR magazine,
Thanks for opening up the CARB regulation for discussion within
your blog (CLICK
HERE to view). Let me start with a true story to which I think
we can all relate. Heading back to Pittsburgh from the Detroit International
Auto Show this past January, the day was beautiful with bright sunshine
despite the near zero temperature. As I drove, the sun beat through
the glass and my face actually felt as if it were being burned.
The solution, of course, was to turn on the fan, open the vents
and let the cold air in. While this worked well to cool my face
and torso, my legs and feet were freezing (even with the "mix"
setting for the vents). We all have experienced this discomfort
while driving, but usually in the summer and the solution is to
crank up the air. On my Detroit trip, the cool air was free, but
we all know that A/C burdens the engine of a car and reduces overall
gas mileage. Burning more fuel creates more CO2 emissions and hence
the issue in California, where Assembly Bill 32 requires the State
to reduce levels of CO2 to what they were in 1990 by 2020.
The logic and the science is quite clear on the subject and very
well detailed in a study by the DOE's National Renewable Energy
Laboratory (NREL). (The report's principal author was John Rugh).
Based on the analysis in that report, a vehicle's fuel mileage could
be improved by up to 4 percent. Pittsburgh Glass Works has estimated
that fuel cost savings when gas is $3/gallon can be over $60 per
year. CARB has received inputs that the up-charge to the OEM for
a coated windshield would be about $20. (Note that per NREL, about
80 percent of the benefit comes from the windshield alone.) However,
since there are lots of arguments about savings and cost assumptions,
let us double the cost and halve the benefit to $40 and $30, respectively.
That still results in a 16-month payback. Of course, this doesn't
take into account how much an OEM will mark up the product, some
of which is justified, but some of which will just be opportunistic.
I leave it to your readers to run the numbers at whatever level
of OEM mark-up they believe will occur. Suffice it to say for this
message, that over a realistic time of ownership, the car owner
will indeed come out cash ahead.
Let's call the cash economics-neutral. That leaves us with all
the other "wins" associated with Infrared Reflective (IRR)
glass. As I see it, this regulation is a quadruple winner. First,
CO2 emissions will be reduced and that is the ultimate intent of
the regulation. Second, and this is more important, should other
states or indeed the country adopt similar requirements, less fuel
will be consumed and that reduces dependence on foreign oil. Perhaps
it is only a bit, but more than one might think (NREL has the data)
and certainly enough not to be scoffed at. Thirdly, the occupants
of the vehicle are more comfortable. No more sweating and freezing
at the same time. There is a reason the Mercedes S-Class uses IRR
glass all around, and it is not fuel savings! Finally, and some
outside our industry may not call this a win, but the glass industry
will have an opportunity to sell more value-added products. This
regulation, especially if it goes nationwide will stimulate innovation
within the automotive glass industry and provide another level upon
which competitors can differentiate themselves.
As one looks back at California regulations, they have actually
gotten some things right. For example, look at the catalytic converter,
which is now ubiquitous, and Los Angeles smog has been reduced.
Closer to home, look at California's commercial and residential
regulations regarding energy-efficient glazing. Both of these regulations
have proven their economic and social benefits. With CARB's recognition
that the "cool paints" are not ready and by slowly ramping
up the glass requirements, they have shown their pragmatism and
willingness to listen to industry and OEMs . As a former employee
in the glass industry, I encourage your readers to support the CARB
"Cool Cars and Reflective Glazing" initiative.
Regards,
Dick Heilman
Former Vice President, Marketing and Research and Development
Pittsburgh Glass Works
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Need more info and analysis about the issues?
CLICK
HERE to subscribe to AGRR magazine.
|