What Auto Glass Shops Say about TPAs in Recent Survey

Third-party administrators (TPAs), direct billing, etc.—pretty much anything related to insurance is always a hot topic, and this was the case when AGRR magazine surveyed its readers to see how the large TPAs and insurers stack up. Participants were asked questions related to efficiency, fairness and general ease in working with them. (For the full article, look to the upcoming January-February issue of AGRR magazine, which also includes a feature article about direct billing. This is all part of AGRR’s special series on getting paid.)

Here, AGRR shares some comments from survey respondents on the topic of TPAs, direct billing and network pricing. Perhaps it will help you in your business as your navigate through the insurance process in an effort to get paid.

“We have been direct billing all insurance companies since December 2013,” says one survey respondent. “Now, four years later, we have established agreements with several companies and still run into short-pays out of the usual suspects, most of which go directly to suit.”

While direct billing does work for some glass shops, others have been frustrated by the game-playing and the presence of the middleman.

“There should not be any middleman steering our services,” says one respondent.

“I’m a very small business and after 15 years of playing the games with insurance companies, I decided to not bill them anymore,” adds another. “I have my customers submit the bills.”

Sadly, some companies have almost given up altogether.

“I almost stopped putting in glass because of TPAs,” says one respondent.

Many others continue to serve the customer with their auto glass needs, but they have done so without being able to raise prices, even as the work has become more complex. And many blame that on Benchmark Pricing.

“Benchmark pricing is the worst thing to happen to glass shops … It’s time to direct bill insurance companies a fair and reasonable price again.”

Another says their shop hasn’t been able to raise prices since the ‘re-alignment’ for pricing back in 2004.”

“All I ever get from the third-party TPA is a larger discount or less dollars per hour on labor,” says this respondent. “The TPAs say it is the insurers, and the insurers say it is the TPA, and I am the one who loses out on any profit. I do twice as many windshield as I used to for half the money.”

Others who have stayed in the business have cut out the insurance company almost completely.

“We do very little insurance work anymore due to the fact that TPAs have removed all the profit from it,” said one respondent. “We now mostly perform work for our loyal customers and walk-in over-the-counter cash customers. If one of our customers wants to use insurance, we have them pay us and submit their bill to their insurance company.”

This article is from glassBYTEs™, the free e-newsletter that covers the latest auto glass industry news. Click HERE to sign up—there is no charge. Interested in a deeper dive? Free subscriptions to Auto Glass Repair and Replacement (AGRR) magazine in print or digital format are available. Subscribe at no charge HERE.

This entry was posted in glassBYTEs Original Story and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to What Auto Glass Shops Say about TPAs in Recent Survey

  1. tc says:

    i have been in the auto glass business since 2001 when nags pricing and insurance discounts were in the right place, but when nags took almost 75% off the list it made it very hard to stay in business and it makes you wonder who got paid to make that happen. The insurance companies dont like the lawsuites involving the AOB but i see why the assignment of benefits is needed to bring fairness. We have some attorneys to help and they have established reasonable rates with some of the ins companies, without legal help we would be out of business

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *