 
New Jersey Judge Approves Six- State Class
Action Over Alleged Volvo Sunroof Defect
April 2, 2013
by Jenna Reed, jreed@glass.com
In a recent ruling, a judge with the New Jersey District Court
has given the go ahead for a six-state class action lawsuit against
Volvo. The crux of the matter centers around Volvo's sunroof on
several models, which plaintiffs allege harbor a defect, allowing
water to flood the vehicles. The judge also denied Volvo's motion
for summary judgment.
The six states Judge Dennis Cavanaugh granted as subclasses for
class action are Massachusetts, Florida, Hawaii, New Jersey, California
and Maryland.
The plaintiffs contend the "defect" sunroofs are on Volvo's
S40, S60, S80, V50 (model years 2004 to present), XC90 (model years
2003 to present) and V50 (model years 2005 to present).
"Plaintiffs allege that the sunroof drainage systems in these
vehicles harbored a defect which allows water to become entrapped
within the passenger compartment floorplans, causing damage to the
vehicles, including interior components, carpets and safety-related
electrical sensors and wiring," according to the court documents.
"Plaintiffs further allege that Volvo had longstanding knowledge
of a material design defect, based on plaintiffs' assertion that
numerous consumer complaints existed as well as internal Volvo communications
and Technical Service Bulletins issued by Volvo in an unsuccessful
attempt to address the problem," the document continues.
Plaintiffs listed in the lawsuit represent each of the states in
which the judge granted approval for class action.
In his opinion, Judge Cavanaugh writes, "In finding that certification
of plaintiffs' proposed statewide classes is warranted, the court
finds that triable issues of fact exist. These issues include whether
the design of the sunroof drainage systems were defectively designed,
whether the defendants knew of the defect but failed to disclose
it to the class and whether the maintenance instructions were inadequate
and/or uniformly deficient. These issues are more than sufficient
to warrant denial of defendants' individual motion for summary judgment."
The suit was filed in 2010 in the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey by Joanne Neale of Needham, Mass.,
and seven other owners.
This story is an original story by AGRR™ magazine/glassBYTEs.com™. Subscribe to AGRR™ Magazine.
Subscribe to receive the free e-newsletter. |